![]() At 15Watts it's more like 1422 single and 6427 multi threaded (didn't test Linux at 15 Watts) which isn't that impressive when you compare it against the Tiger Lake's 5955 multi threaded score with only half the number of CPU cores: clearly Ryzen is starved for power at 15 Watts. On the mobile 5800U I get 1431 single and 7900 on the 28Watts envelope with Windows while Linux will deliver 14. Actually it even puts it above my 5800X (1696) and 5950X (1690) single Windows scores while Linux will righten the balance with 1794/1784 on the Ryzens.įor the multi-threaded benchmarks my 5950X will deliver 16619 on Linux while the top result on Windows is 15492. M1 Max 32-core GPU Geekbench 5 OpenCL Benchmark: 60167 Equivalent to a desktop VXT, or mobile 1660 Ti Max-Q. ![]() My Tiger Lake NUC i7-1165G7 single core results on Linux (1721) seem to imply much faster hardware than on Windows (1568). The clock frequency of the integrated graphics has also been increased slightly: from 1.3 GHz to 1.4 GHz in the Apple M2. The smaller efficiency cores now clock at 2.8 GHz instead of 2.06 GHz on the Apple M1. Seems like M1 Max is around 4-5 faster in multi-core and 1-2 faster in single-core workloads. The clock frequency of the Apple M2 is now up to 3.5 GHz, where the Apple M1 stopped at 3.2 GHz. I was wondering if I made a mistake going with M1 Pro instead of M1 Max. Generally I observed much higher results with Linux or Android-x86 than Windows on the very same hardware. Hey, I parsed Geekbench scores and did a quick violin plot. I have consistently found a relatively high OS bias in Geekbench results, which I actually assume to be mostly a compiler bias given the nature of those benchmarks. Well with a sample of one non-retail system, these results may not be meaningful. Perhaps, usage of faster memory would have given Intel's ADL-P an advantage, but we will need to run our own tests to find out. Furthermore, it is considerably behind Apple's M1-series system-on-chips that have been single-thread performance leaders for about a year now. Just after Apple's event introducing the new MacBook Pro models with M1 Pro and M1 Max chips, the first benchmark for the high-end M1 Max chip with 10-core CPU and 32-core GPU. Quite surprisingly, Intel's Core i7-12700H 'Alder Lake-P' fails to beat the Core i7-11800H 'Tiger Lake-H' as well as AMD's Ryzen 7 5800H 'Cezanne' (Zen 3) in single-threaded workloads. Since overall GB5 results are heavily impacted by cryptography, it makes sense to look at integer and float benchmark results of the new CPUs and compare them to respective numbers obtained on other processors. Because Alder Lake-P officially lacks AVX-512 support, the processor will be slower than chips supporting these instructions in certain workloads. Intel's Core i7-12700H CPU packs six high-(P)erformance Golden Cove cores and eight energy-(E)fficient Gracemont cores, so it should perform considerably better compared to Intel's existing mobile CPUs in multi-threaded workloads. Meanwhile, it looks like both machines are equipped with DDR4-3200 memory, which might have limited their performance in single-threaded workloads. The numbers demonstrated by both machines are really close, so we can assume that the readings are more or less accurate. I do wonder if it can actually deliver 15 W out of every TB port and 10 W out of the USBA ports, simultaneously.Alleged Geekbench 5 results obtained on Gigabyte's Aero 5 XE and HP's Omen 17 laptops with Intel's Core i7-12700H inside were added to the benchmark's database on Friday, revealing the performance of the upcoming mobile Alder Lake-P in this popular synthetic benchmark. ![]() 40 W for the CPU cluster and 60 W for the GPU cluster, give or take. That's 80 W, with 105 W for everything else. They have increased the size of the power supply to 185 W for the M2 Pro model.Ĥ TB ports at 15 W. That enclosure with a fan should definitely be able to keep it cool enough to prevent throttling.Īpple's Tech Specs page says the mini w/M2 has 150 W of continuous power draw and the mini w/M2 Pro has 185 W of continuous power draw. That means all GPU and CPU cores working along with memory completely full. If I had to guess, and I do as I couldn't find any real numbers, the higher end M2 Pro probably doesn't draw more than 100W when fully loaded. There's a fan in the mini, shouldn't have any thermal issues. I’m wondering if the fastest one will have any issues with throttling due to overheating in that small enclosure. I’ll be interested to see if anyone does benchmarks comparing the top two processors available in the new Mac Mini.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |